Hi Jean - it's going to be in the next update of Cosmobiology. In the end I did a 200000 loop to make the figures as accurate as possible. I tried a 300000 loop, but the figures didn't vary much. 200000 is about 550 years, which captures at least 2 Pluto cycles, so 300000 is redundant data. I won't include the loop each time as it takes a while, but no more than 5 minutes I would say, probably less. The code was used to generate this array:
distanceArray[10][4] = { 0.98302429, 1.01697475, 0.99999952, 1.00408958 }, { 0.00238238, 0.00271865, 0.00255052, 0.00245624 },
{ 0.54908403, 1.45148001, 1.00028202, 1.15369470 }, { 0.26402321, 1.73610976, 1.00006648, 0.88283971 }, { 0.37272573, 2.67622323, 1.52447448, 1.72341608 },
{ 3.94873521, 6.45601472, 5.20237497, 5.82141580 }, { 8.00184101, 11.08963697, 9.54573899, 10.36503582 }, { 17.28781037, 21.09275074, 19.19028056, 20.63641862 },
{ 28.82187177, 31.32439679, 30.07313428, 30.80806348 }, { 28.68066290, 50.27479641, 39.47772965, 34.63600460 }
This is for Sun through Pluto: the first field is the perigee figure, the second apogee, the third is the average ((perigee + apogee) / 2), the final figure is the median value.
Ed